VACCINE FAST FACTS

The mantra of “safe vaccines” is taking on more water, as the use of the Johnson & Johnson DNA technology-based COVID vaccine is being halted due to safety issues. That follows problems with the AstraZeneca vaccine. Both have been tied to dangerous blood clots.

Meanwhile, the CDC has reported that as of 5 April, over 2,794 deaths have been recorded in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). VAERS is a self-reporting database used by the medical community to track incidents, injuries, and deaths caused by vaccines.

The website Vaccineimpact.com noted that the VAERS database listed 345 vaccine-related deaths for all of 2020. The latest death numbers from COVID vaccines surpass all the vaccine-related deaths reported in VAERS dating back from 2010 through 2020.

The latest VAERS data shows:

  • 2,794 COVID vaccine-related deaths
  • 56,869 COVID vaccine-related injuries
  • 8,975 visits to Emergency Room doctors
  • 941 permanent disabilities
  • 4,972 hospitalizations

Clinics in Colorado and North Carolina suspended the J&J vaccine following incidents, according to the AP:

“North Carolina health officials said on Thursday that they stopped administering Johnson & Johnson doses at a mass vaccination site in Raleigh and at clinics in Hillsborough and Chapel Hill after at least 26 people experienced adverse reactions, including fainting.”

According to the CDC’s COVID data tracker website, at least 114,436,039 people have received at least one dose of a COVID vaccine in the U.S. so far, and 68,202,458 people have been fully vaccinated. 59.4 percent of people over the age of 65 have been vaccinated.

Worldwide, more than 748 million shots have been administered, according to Bloomberg. The U.S., Europe, and parts of the Middle East continue to have the highest vaccination rates. Africa is among the least-vaccinated regions in the world, though Morocco has given COVID doses to about 12 percent of its population.

China, where the virus originated, has dispensed roughly 155 million doses, but that only covers 5.5 percent of its population. In South America, Chile continues to be the highest-vaccinated country, with about 31 percent of its population vaccinated.


Support the Trends Journal with these great products


3 Comments
  1. harlow53 1 year ago

    Below is the latest questions about the unethical and unprofessional activities of the NIH, Fauci and the Wuhan Virology Institute (WVI) from Dr Mercola’s web site:

    STORY AT-A-GLANCE
    The NIH and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), led by Dr. Anthony Fauci, have funded gain-of-function research on coronaviruses. Several such grants were given to EcoHealth Alliance, which in turn subcontracted some of that research to the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV)
    A loophole in the review process set up to ensure the safety of gain-of-function research allows funding institutions to bypass review. Fauci and the NIAID are accused of shirking the review process for some of the research performed at the WIV
    Two lengthy reports have been published detailing Fauci’s questionable research activities and attempts to mislead the public on a number of issues, including the benefits of hydroxychloroquine, the effectiveness of masks and the possibility of SARS-CoV-2 being a lab creation
    Many were aware that gain-of-function research on coronaviruses and other dangerous pathogens was taking place at the WIV, and that the lab had known safety lapses, yet nothing appears to have been done to shore up security and prevent an outbreak
    While government officials would like you to believe that SARS-CoV-2 is one of the most serious threats to life on earth, the reality is that the gain-of-function research they fund is a far greater threat. Even if the COVID-19 pandemic wasn’t the result of this kind of research, history tells us there will be another leak. It’s only a matter of time, which is why we must ban all gain-of-function research, worldwide
    We first reported on this issue with my interview with Francis Boyle over a year ago, which received well over one million views. Of course, our coverage was disparaged as fake news and removed from YouTube, but now one year later it appears the facts are confirming our speculations.

    In the April 4, 2021, Sky News report above, award-winning investigations writer Sharri Markson summarizes the findings1,2,3,4 of the World Health Organization’s investigative team, tasked with identifying the origin of SARS-CoV-2.

    She blasts the report as a “PR exercise for China,” calling the team’s conclusion that one of the most likely origin theories was that the virus entered Wuhan in or on frozen food from overseas, “embarrassing.” As noted by Markson, even the director-general of the WHO ended up backpedaling in an effort to salvage the organization’s credibility.5

    As reported by The Washington Post, March 30, 2021,6 the WHO director general, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, and 13 other world leaders have now joined the U.S. government in expressing “frustration with the level of access China granted an international mission to Wuhan.”

    According to Ghebreyesus, the team “did not conduct an ‘extensive enough’ assessment of the possibility the virus was introduced to humans through a laboratory incident,” which will therefore necessitate additional studies with “more timely and comprehensive data sharing.

    NIH Has ‘Systematically Thwarted’ Oversight Efforts

    I’ve previously detailed how the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), led by Dr. Anthony Fauci, have funded gain-of-function research on coronaviruses. Several such grants were given to EcoHealth Alliance, which in turn subcontracted some of that research to the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV).

    EcoHealth Alliance is led by Dr. Peter Daszak, who is also on the WHO’s investigative team, and who has plenty of reasons to hide the truth, were the virus in fact from the WIV. In 2014, a federal moratorium was placed on gain-of-function research, which focuses on making pathogens more virulent and lethal, due to public safety concerns.

    After the moratorium was lifted in 2017, a special review board, the Potential Pandemic Pathogens Control and Oversight, or P3CO Review Framework, was created within the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), to evaluate “whether grants that involve enhancing dangerous pathogens, such as coronaviruses, are worth the risks and that proper safeguards are in place,” Daily Caller reports.7

    According to Rutgers University professor Richard Ebright, an NIH grant for research involving the modification of bat coronaviruses at the WIV was sneaked through because the NIAID failed to flag it for review.8 In other words, the WIV received federal funding from the NIAID without the research first receiving a green-light from the HHS review board. According to the Daily Caller:9

    “The review framework split oversight responsibilities between two groups — the funding agency … and the P3CO Review Committee … The committee is responsible for recommending whether a research grant involving gain-of-function needs to include any additional risk mitigation measures … But the committee is kept in the dark on any grant until the funding agency flags one for its review …

    Ebright said the offices of the director for the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) — the subagency that funded EcoHealth — and the NIH have ‘systematically thwarted — indeed systematically nullified — the HHS P3CO Framework by declining to flag and forward proposals for review’ …

    Had EcoHealth’s grant been subjected to P3CO review, an HHS panel would have independently evaluated the grant and, if necessary, recommended additional biocontainment measures to prevent potential lab leaks — or even recommended that the grant be denied entirely.”

    Fauci’s ‘Criminal Violations’ Deserve Review

    Fauci has more than one or two questions to answer, though, considering at least two lengthy reports have been issued detailing Fauci’s questionable research activities and attempts to mislead the public on a number of issues, including the benefits of hydroxychloroquine, the effectiveness of masks and the possibility of SARS-CoV-2 being a lab creation.

    Using the power of NIAID during the alleged pandemic, Dr. Anthony Fauci actively suppressed proven medical countermeasures used by, and validated in scientific proceedings, that offered alternatives to the products funded by his conspiring entities for which he had provided direct funding and for whom he would receive tangible and intangible benefit. ~ David E. Martin
    One report, “Dr. Fauci’s COVID-19 Treachery,”14 was written by Dr. Peter Breggin and published in October 2020. The other, a 205-page paper titled “The Fauci/COVID-19 Dossier,”15 was compiled by Dr. David E. Martin, in which he reviews “numerous criminal violations” by Fauci, the CDC and others, “that may be associated with the COVID-19 terrorism.” Here’s just a small sampling of paragraphs from Martin’s paper:

    “Using the power of NIAID during the alleged pandemic, Dr. Anthony Fauci actively suppressed proven medical countermeasures used by, and validated in scientific proceedings, that offered alternatives to the products funded by his conspiring entities for which he had provided direct funding and for whom he would receive tangible and intangible benefit …

    NIAID’s Director, Dr. Anthony Fauci is listed as an inventor on 8 granted U.S. patents. None of them are reported in NIAID, NIH, or GAO reports of active licensing despite the fact that Dr. Fauci reportedly was compelled to get paid for his interleukin-2 ‘invention’ …

    Through non-competitive grant awards to UNC Chapel Hill’s Ralph Baric, to selection of the Bio-Safety Level 4 laboratory locations, to the setting of prices for Remdesivir and mRNA therapies from Moderna and Pfizer, NIAID, CDC, and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services have been involved in allocating Federal funds to conspiring parties without independent review.

    Around March 12, 2020, in an effort to enrich their own economic interests by way of securing additional funding from both Federal and Foundation actors, the CDC and NIAID’s Dr. Fauci elected to suspend testing and classify COVID-19 by capricious symptom presentation alone.

    Forcing the public to rely on The COVID Tracking Project — funded by the Bloomberg, Zuckerberg and Gates Foundation and presented by a media outlet — not a public health agency — Dr. Fauci used fraudulent testing technology (RT-PCR) to conflate ‘COVID cases’ with positive PCR tests in the living while insisting that COVID deaths be counted by symptoms alone.

    This perpetuated a market demand for his desired vaccine agenda which was recited by him and his conspiring parties around the world until the present. Not surprisingly, this was necessitated by the apparent fall in cases that constituted Dr. Fauci’s and others’ criteria for depriving citizens of their 1st Amendment rights …

    While Moderna enjoys hundreds of millions of dollars of funding allegiance and advocacy from Anthony Fauci and his NIAID, since its inception, it has been engaged in illegal patent activity and demonstrated contempt for U.S. Patent law. To make matters worse, the U.S. Government has given it financial backing in the face of undisclosed infringement risks potentially contributing to the very infringement for which they are indemnified.

    Gain-of-Function Research Is the Real Threat

    While government health officials would like you to believe that SARS-CoV-2 is one of the most serious threats to life on earth, the reality is that the gain-of-function research they fund is a far greater threat. It’s quite possible that the COVID-19 pandemic was the result of this kind of research, but even if it wasn’t, history tells us there will be another release, another leak, another accident. They happen far more frequently than people like to imagine.

    Already, as detailed in “New Engineered Coronaviruses Are Under Development” and “Bioweapons Labs Get More NIH Funding for Deadly Research,” scientists are tinkering around with SARS-CoV-2, trying to see if they can make an even worse version. Meanwhile, the same establishment is drumming up panic in the streets, warning of new, more infectious and dangerous variants. Never do they tell you that they’re also busy creating them.

    This hypocrisy must end. I firmly believe we need to ban gain-of-function research across the world. We do not need it. As noted by Marc Lipsitch in his 2018 review, “Why Do Exceptionally Dangerous Gain-of-Function Experiments in Influenza?”:23

    “While there are indisputably certain questions that can be answered only by gain-of-function experiments in highly pathogenic strains, these questions are narrow and unlikely to meaningfully advance public health goals such as vaccine production and pandemic prediction.

    Alternative approaches to experimental influenza virology and characterization of existing strains are in general completely safe, higher throughput, more generalizable, and less costly than creation of PPP [potential pandemic pathogens] in the laboratory and can thereby better inform public health.

    Indeed, virtually every finding of recent PPP experiments that has been cited for its public health value was predated by similar findings using safe methodologies.”

    While the origin of SARS-CoV-2 remains to be conclusively proven, a paper24 published in Nature in 2015 discussed how a “lab-made coronavirus related to SARS” capable of infecting human cells had stirred up debate as to whether or not this kind of research is worth the risks:

    “Although the extent of any risk is difficult to assess, Simon Wain-Hobson, a virologist at the Pasteur Institute in Paris, points out that the researchers have created a novel virus that ‘grows remarkably well’ in human cells. ‘If the virus escaped, nobody could predict the trajectory,’ he says.”

    With 20/20 hindsight, we now have a much clearer idea of what the release of such a virus can do. We may chalk it up to luck that SARS-CoV-2 turned out to be orders of magnitude less lethal than initially suspected, although government containment measures have turned out to be devastating and deadly as well. If this kind of research is allowed to continue, the next time there’s a leak, we may not be as lucky

  2. Kellie Auld 1 year ago

    From a BC Canada Doctor to the Provincial Health Officer

    Dear Dr. Henry,
    The first dose of the Moderna vaccine has now been administered to some of my patients in the
    community of Lytton, BC. This began with the First Nations members of our community in mid-
    January, 2021. 900 doses have now been administered.
    I have been quite alarmed at the high rate of serious side-effects from this novel treatment.
    From this relatively small number of people vaccinated so far, we have had:
    1. Numerous allergic reactions, with two cases of anaphylaxis.
    2. One (presumed) vaccine induced sudden death, (in a 72 year old patient with COPD.
    This patient complained of being more short of breath continually after receiving the
    vaccine, and died very suddenly and unexpectedly on day 24, after the vaccine. He had
    no history of cardiovascular disease).
    3. Three people with ongoing and disabling neurological deficits, with associated chronic
    pain, persisting for more than 10 weeks after their first vaccine. These neurological
    deficits include; continual and disabling dizziness, generalised or localised
    neuromuscular weakness, with or without sensory loss. The chronic pain in these
    patients is either generalised or regional, with or without headaches.
    So in short, in our small community of Lytton, BC, we have one person dead, and three people
    who look as though they will be permanently disabled, following their first dose of the Moderna
    vaccine. The age of those affected ranges from 38 to 82 years of age.
    So I have a couple of questions and comments;
    1. Are these considered normal and acceptable long term side-effects for gene modification
    therapy? Judging by medical reports from around the world, our Lytton experience is not
    unusual.
    2. Do you have any idea what disease processes may have been initiated, to be producing
    these ongoing neurological symptoms?
    3. Do you have any suggestions as to how I should treat the vaccine induced
    neuromuscular weakness, the dizziness, the sensory loss, and the chronic pain
    syndromes in these people, or should they all be simply referred to a neurologist? I
    anticipate that many more will follow, as the vaccine is rolled out. This was only phase
    one, and the first dose.
    4. In stark contrast to the deleterious effects of this vaccine in our community, we have not
    had to give any medical care what-so-ever, to anyone with Covid-19. So in our limited
    experience, this vaccine is quite clearly more dangerous than Covid-19.
    5. I realise that every medical therapy has a risk-benefit ratio, and that serious disease
    calls for serious medicine. But we now know that the recovery rate of Covid-19, is
    similar to the seasonal flu, in every age category. Furthermore, it is well known that
    the side effects following the second shot, are significantly worse than the first. So the
    worst is still to come.
    6. It must be emphasised, that these people were not sick people, being treated for some
    devastating disease. These were previously healthy people, who were offered an
    experimental therapy, with unknown long-term side-effects, to protect them against an
    illness that has the same mortality rate as the flu. Sadly, their lives have now been
    ruined.
    7. It is normally considered a fundamental principal of medical ethics, to discontinue a
    clinical trial if significant harm is demonstrated from the treatment under investigation.
    8. So my last question is this; Is it medically ethical to continue this vaccine rollout, in
    view of the severity of these life altering side-effects, after just the first shot? In
    Lytton, BC, we have an incidence of 1 in 225 of severe life altering side-effects, from this
    experimental gene modification therapy.
    I have also noticed that these vaccine induced side effects are going almost entirely unreported,
    by those responsible for the vaccine rollout. I am aware that this is often a problem, with
    vaccines in general, and that delayed side-effects after vaccines, are sometimes labelled as
    being “coincidences”, as causality is often hard to prove. However, in view of the fact that this is
    an experimental treatment, with no long-term safety data, I think that perhaps this issue should
    be addressed too.
    Furthermore I have noticed, that the provincial vaccine injury reporting form, which was clearly
    designed for conventional vaccines, does not even have any place to report vaccine injuries of
    the nature and severity that we are seeing from this new mRNA therapy.
    It is now clearly apparent with medical evidence from around the world, that the side-effect
    profiles of the various gene modification therapies against Covid-19, have been vastly
    understated by their manufacturers, who were eager to prove their safety.
    Thank you for your attention to this critically urgent public health matter.
    Yours Dr. C. Hoffe

  3. Remo Turisci 1 year ago

    hello my friends at the trends journal
    the global experiment continues ,
    the ruling classes the super rich the people that we know nothing about
    are continuing there experiment on the human race right before our
    very eyes as we watch and wonder what the future will become in
    this new world of robotic automation ,control of the human race
    by dosing people up with there experimental vac, taking away our rights
    and our lives and killing the way we live
    control and power that is the aim of the ruling super wealth that will take us over

Leave a reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

©2022 The Trends Journal

Log in with your credentials

Forgot your details?