SHAREHOLDERS, COURT DARKEN OIL INDUSTRY’S FUTURE

Listen to Article

Oil prices edged higher late last week as the world’s economy continued its bumpy recovery, even as shareholders and a Dutch court clouded Big Oil’s already uncertain future.

On Wednesday, a court in the Netherlands ruled that Royal Dutch Shell must slash its greenhouse gas emissions 45 percent by 2030, compared to the company’s 2019 levels. 

The court sided with plaintiff MilieuDefensie, a climate activist group claiming the company violates human rights by worsening the climate crisis through its inadequate actions to address the issue.

Shell previously had pledged to cut its emissions 20 percent by 2030 and reach carbon neutrality by 2050.

The company will appeal the ruling; MilieuDefensie says it already is aiding other groups in bringing similar suits.

Later in the same day, ExxonMobil shareholders ignored objections from the company’s management and replaced two current directors with climate-friendly candidates supported by Blackrock Asset Management, the world’s largest investment company and ExxonMobil’s third-largest shareholder.

The vote has been too close to call on a third board seat, for which another Blackrock-supported nominee ran.

The upstart board candidates were nominated by Engine No. 1, a climate-oriented hedge fund that holds a $50-million fraction of ExxonMobil’s $250 billion market capitalization.

Engine No. 1 has blamed ExxonMobil’s sinking financial performance in recent years on the company’s unwillingness to adapt to a world economy shifting away from fossil fuels.

Also on the same day, 61 percent of Chevron’s shareholders voted to support a proposal that the company cut emissions generated by the burning of the oil and gas Chevron produces.

The mechanism by which Chevron would be expected to fulfill such a mandate was not specified. 

Instead, the vote was largely symbolic and intended to express shareholders’ frustration with the company’s lackadaisical response to the climate crisis and its clear implications for the oil business, analysts said.

The three events, all on the same day, “add up to this sea change,” Andrew Logan, head of oil and gas at the Ceres investor network, said in comments quoted by Grist.org. 

“The time when investors were willing to trust the board and management to do the right things has passed,” he said.

Also, investors face the growing prospect of a “carbon bubble,” in which they could be left holding coal, oil, and gas deposits rapidly losing their value as the world shifts to renewable power.

The three challenges to Big Oil’s standard operating procedures followed a startling 18 May call by the International Energy Agency for nations to stop approving new coal-fired electric generation plants, stop permitting new oil and gas development, and quickly shift to vehicles not run by fossil fuels.

Such drastic steps are urgently needed to avert a climate catastrophe, the agency said.

TREND FORECAST: The global divestment movement has drained about $14 trillion from the fossil fuels industry since 2013 and will continue. More lawsuits from activist groups, including coalitions of young people seeing a carbon-fogged future for themselves, are lining up against producers.

Pressure on energy companies to curtail fossil-fuel production will continue to grow, especially as vehicle makers pledge to end the production of gas and diesel cars and trucks before 2040.

Trends Journal readers learned as long ago as 2018 that the oil industry was no longer a safe, long-term investment but was increasingly a short-term speculative play.

TREND FORECAST: As the COVID War winds down, the climate change trend will accelerate. And, as we have been doing, we will continue to keep readers abreast of the winners and losers in the race for clean energy.

5 Comments
  1. Eagle11 1 year ago

    Unless society adopts widespread use of Thorium energy, I don’t see a viable alternative to hydrocarbons.

    But, seeing that Blackrock is involved, the planl is probably the elites will end up with reliable energy (in whatever form), while slavelandia will be stuck with unreliable and weak energy sources.

    I notice the military never gets fingered for the immense air, water, and land pollution they are responsible for. Not to mention the human suffering.

  2. Buck Fiden 1 year ago

    So, without oil, how exactly do they plan to create this new world? No plastics? Perhaps soy which will remove more of the food supply? Do they really believe we will have all-electric giant excavators to move the earth to get the silver that solar requires? It’s going to get very cold before long as the climate change lie has been sold so thoroughly by the Elite to the credulous sheep.

  3. lvblasiotti 1 year ago

    Just because they are rich does not mean that that they will not make huge mistakes resulting in misery for the slaves of slavelandia…..this is why freedom of choice results in better decisions for the masses.

  4. […] we reported in “Shareholders, Court Darken Oil Industry’s Future” (1 Jun 2021), the global divestment movement has drained about $14 trillion from the fossil fuels […]

  5. […] divestment movement that has lopped an estimated $14 trillion from the industry, as we reported in “Shareholders, Court Darken Oil Industry’s Future” (1 Jun […]

Leave a reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

©2022 The Trends Journal

Log in with your credentials

Forgot your details?