The MSM has applauded. But with over 350 Capitol protesters arrested since 6 January and National Guard troops camped out in Washington, D.C. indefinitely, there’s no denying a troubling line has been crossed into making political expression criminal.

That effort is quickly ramping up in the new Biden administration. Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi has called for a 9/11 style commission to investigate and prosecute protesters and organizers. This even though the only person killed via willful violence on 6 January was Ashlee Babbit, an 11-year Air Force veteran who was shot at point-blank range while unarmed and not attacking anyone. The identity of her killer has been shielded by the government, and the media has not pressed for a name.

In a briefing this past Friday, Justice Department and FBI officials raised the possibility of expanding investigative and prosecutorial tools in cases of so-called “domestic terrorism,” the byword Democrats have used to smear not only Capitol protesters, but groups like the Proud Boys, Oath Keepers, QAnon “plain vanilla” Trump supporters, and even senators including Ted Cruz and Josh Hawley. 

Currently, a domestic terrorism statute doesn’t exist, and domestic groups have constitutional rights and protections that don’t extend to foreign groups and actors. But that may soon change if ideological partisans get their way. One senior official at the briefing admitted that current statutory definitions of domestic terrorism already “expand a lot of authorities we can use,” including nationwide search warrants, expanded law-enforcement access to tax and educational records, and harsher sentencing.

A senior Justice Department official suggested the Biden administration would consider seeking a domestic-terrorism statute, in addition to those expansive statutes. “Obviously that’s going to be a policy question for the folks that are coming in. I’m sure we’ll run a data-driven process to see whether we need additional legislative authorities in this area.”

Meanwhile, Acting Deputy Attorney General John Carlin has said the Justice Department is taking an even hand, despite no one scrutinizing the near $100 million given to BLM during nationwide riots in 2020. Organizers there were out to pin an incident of police brutality against George Floyd in a Democrat-controlled city and state as an indictment of the Trump administration.

Carlin said the DOJ was “prioritizing the detection, disruption, and deterrence of domestic terrorism and violent extremism in all its forms.” While admitting the administration was seeking to expand powers with a purported goal of preventing radicalization and disrupting "extremist networks," Carlin pledged that civil liberties protections would remain a priority.

Code for Leftist Political Violence Approved by MSM

There's nothing unique about the January Capitol protesters in terms of what they did. In 2013, protesters stormed and occupied the Wisconsin state capitol for days, stopping legislators from proceedings. The mainstream media cheered them. 

In 2018, a huge throng protesting Senate confirmation hearings for Justice Brett Kavanaugh occupied the Hart Senate Office Building on Capitol Hill. They intimidated legislators and personnel in their offices and defied capitol police. Again, the MSM sided with the protesters, and there was zero talk of “insurrection” or obstructing or intimidating and threatening legislators.

No statute makes one Federal building in Washington, D.C. legally more sacrosanct than another. 

In 2020, Federal buildings and police precincts in Portland and elsewhere were repeatedly attacked by BLM and Antifa protesters. Scores of people, including multiple police officers, were seriously injured and even killed during those riots. And hundreds of millions of dollars in damage, via looting and burning, was done to private businesses and homes. Just this month, two radical attorneys who firebombed a police car during those protests were offered a plea deal by federal prosecutors, according to the NY Post. (Click here for the Post’s article.)

Republican politicians and their loved ones, including Rand Paul, had to run a gauntlet of violent protesters when exiting the RNC convention. Paul was shoved, and along with others, faced more physical intimidation and vitriol than Alexandria Oscaio Cortez – or any other politician – during the 6 January Capitol protest.

There is a dangerous double-standard becoming the de facto law of the land when it comes to Democrat-approved protesters. 

Support the Trends Journal with these great products

  1. David Kallstrom 1 year ago

    Sad direction for this country. I find it hard to believe that most Americans agree with violent protests for protests stake. Still it seems to me that “PROTESTERS” being paid to protest is a con job.

  2. ervin siemens 1 year ago

    corruption breeds corruption! We are seeing it here in Edmonton Alberta Canada, peaceful protesters coming out saying no more lock downs of our churches and what did the NDP party do? They hired BLM groups with slogans of hate and violence and the “police” arrest the peaceful protesters and no a single word from any media condemning it besides rebel news. Very disgusting. Hate is now good and good is now hated.

  3. lvblasiotti 1 year ago

    They are using Jan 6 protest to expand government control and power thus taking away more freedom and liberty. Look at the theater they have created using U.S. Troops to surround the capitol as if conservatives would attack the capitol. This is all BS. Historically every conservative protest has been peaceful…why…they even pick up the trash when they disperse. This Jan 6 protest was commanderd by Antifa and BLM and other communist led/controlled organizations. They know it, the FBI knows it, as does the Intelligence agencies but (as a former Washington politician stated to never let an opportunity go to waste) are using it to expand government and to gain more power and control.
    They have no morals, no honor, no dignity, no fear of God, no honesty, no conscience and no respect for the American people. They have either been bought off, blackmailed, or aggressively intent on getting to the top no matter the cost to the country.

  4. Eagle11 1 year ago

    I don’t know what people can do to come against the tyranny. Can’t speak, can’t assemble, can’t write or text.

    The only thing left is to exit the system. To the extent you can anyway,

    Most people cannot “go Gault”, but you can buy local; bank local (as Mr. Celente has advocated). Stop using facebook, twitter, etc., cut the cable.

    Stop giving your time, money, and energy to a political party or candidate! Or better yet, follow Mr. Celente’s lead and become a political atheist.

    Not the whole solution, but it is a start.

  5. […] Trends Journal has chronicled that abuse in articles including “POLITICAL PRISONERS IN THE U.S.A.” (2 March 2021), “FBI USES “DOMESTIC TERRORISM” LABEL TO TARGET POLITICAL DISSENT” (4 May […]

  6. […] occupations of the Hart Senate Office Building and the Wisconsin State House, as referenced in “POLITICAL PRISONERS IN THE U.S.A.,” 2 March […]

  7. […] legitimate peaceful dissent systematically since the day Biden took office. (See stories such as “POLITICAL PRISONERS IN THE U.S.A.” (22 Mar 2021), “POST OFFICE PLAYING SPYMASTERS” (27 Apr 2021) and “FBI ENCOURAGES SNITCHING […]

Leave a reply

©2022 The Trends Journal

Log in with your credentials

Forgot your details?